You Have Workflow. Why Is Work Still Moving Slowly?

2026-09-23

A few years ago, “having workflow” was a milestone worth being proud of: no more paperwork circulating endlessly, no more lost purchase requests, no more operations grinding to a halt just because the boss was traveling.

But many CEOs and operations managers I talk to are running into a paradox: the workflow has been digitized for years, and yet operating speed has barely moved. A purchase request still takes three or four days to clear every signature. A quality incident still waits for a meeting before anyone knows who’s handling it. People still message each other “hey, can you approve this” on chat apps, even while the workflow system is running in parallel.

If that sounds familiar, the right question isn’t “is this workflow software any good.” It’s: what kind of workflow does your company actually have?

Digitized Workflow Is Not the Same as Optimized Workflow

This is the most common confusion. Digitizing a process means taking a sequence of steps that used to run on paper or by email and turning it into an electronic form with a chain of people signing one after another.

That solves a real problem — lost documents, delays because nobody could find a file, the difficulty of reconstructing an approval history. But it doesn’t change the nature of the process. The sequence is still linear, the next person still waits on the last one, and the system still doesn’t know when to act unless someone manually clicks a button.

In other words: digitization makes a process clearer, but not necessarily faster. Those are two different things, and most digital transformation budgets over the past few years have gone toward the first, without ever reaching the second.

Three Reasons Workflow Still Creates Friction

1. Steps stay sequential when they don’t need to be. Many approval steps are chained one after another (A, then B, then C) simply because that’s how it was done on paper — not because the actual business logic requires that order. When the process gets digitized, that sequential habit is usually carried over instead of being reconsidered.

2. The system carries no context. The person approving step three only sees a completed form — not why steps one and two were decided the way they were. Without that context, they often have to ask, wait for an explanation, or — worse — approve without enough information to actually evaluate the request.

3. Exceptions have nowhere to go. Workflow is designed for the standard case. The moment something is slightly different — a new supplier not yet in the system, a spend that exceeds the usual limit — the system can’t handle it, and everything immediately drops into an informal channel: a phone call, a text message, a private email.

None of these three causes are the fault of a specific piece of software. They’re the result of digitizing a process without redesigning it.

Warning Signs

Your company may be facing exactly this problem if:

• A request gets “stuck” and nobody can say for sure which step it’s at until someone asks the person handling it directly.
• Exceptions are consistently handled outside the system, even while the workflow tool keeps running.
• Someone in the organization has become the unofficial “chaser” — if they’re out, everything slows down noticeably.
• The number of approval steps in the software is identical to the number of physical signatures required before — nothing was combined, removed, or made to run in parallel.

If two or more of these are true for your company, the problem is almost certainly not a matter of switching to a different workflow tool. It’s how the process itself was designed.

Questions Worth Asking Before You Look for New Software

Before adding another workflow tool, or another feature to the one you already have, three questions are worth asking:

1. Does our most important process genuinely need every step to be sequential, or is it sequential out of habit?
2. Does the person handling each step have enough context to decide quickly, or are they having to go find missing information themselves?
3. When something unusual happened last week, did it move through the system — or through a phone call or private message?

If the answers suggest that most of the organization’s “speed” still depends on people reminding each other, hunting down information, and handling exceptions manually, the current workflow is still early in a longer journey — not the destination.

That’s also a good reason to assess your workflow systematically, rather than relying on a general feeling of “we’re slow” without knowing exactly where, or why.

This article is part of a series on workflow, AI adoption, and operational management for manufacturing SMEs.

Related articles:

• Next-Generation Workflow: When AI and Organizational Knowledge Change How Work Operates
• Digitized vs. Optimized Workflow: What’s the Difference?

→ Complete the Digitalization Readiness Assessment